Script-aware segmentation, benchmarked head-to-head against PU-Tok on real FLORES-200 data — not a toy corpus.
Benchmarked vs. PU-TokHyper-Token uses script-aware atomic segmentation — grapheme clusters for Latin/Cyrillic, whole characters for CJK, DFA-based syllables for Indic abugidas — followed by adaptive merge scoring, then benchmarked directly against PU-Tok on identical data.
FLORES-200 devtest, 30 languages, held-out split, both tokenizers trained fresh at a matched 24K vocab budget:
Cyrillic, Greek, Armenian, Thai, Lao, Khmer, and Amharic — 8 of 30 languages. We're treating this as a real signal about where each tokenizer's design choices help or hurt, not something to paper over.
Early internal numbers (50.1% fewer tokens vs. BPE, 1.6M chars/sec) came from a 20-sentence toy corpus, not FLORES-200. We don't publish those anymore — the verified numbers above replace them, and the speed number turned out to be better than the original estimate.
© 2026 Cybergeon Technologies. All numbers on this site are re-verified against real code before publishing.